Thursday, January 12, 2006
Good plants/bad plants
The possible implications are set out in Nature by David Lowe of New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, who writes: "We now have the spectre that new forests might increase greenhouse warming through methane emissions rather than decrease it by sequestering carbon dioxide."
If this turned out to be true, it would have major implications for the rules of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, which allows countries and companies to offset emissions from the burning of fossil fuels like coal and oil by funding the planting of new forests or the restoration of deforested areas.
On the other hand, this shows how easy it is to think we understand what's going on. If a significant percentage of atmospheric methane is a product of normal plant growth, that makes the centrally planned dictates of the Kyoto protocol an even blunter instrument than we all thought.
Fortunately, the article ends on a note of reason:
In fact, of course, trees are neither good nor bad. They are just there, and if they are producing methane now they always have been in natural conditions.
The study highlights, however, the extreme complexity of the relationship between the biological processes of the Earth and the chemistry of our atmosphere - and how much there is yet to discover.How true.